Leadership Styles Of Jesus Christ And Paul Religion Essay

Leadership Styles Of saviour savior And capital of Minnesota Religion EssayThis essay go forth examine the theoretical concepts of leadershiphip, showing their strengths and weaknesses. The leadership styles of Jesus messiah and Apostle capital of Minnesota will be discussed followed by the leadership qualities expected from the perform as illustrated by the five-fold ministry open in Pauls epistle to the Ephesians Chapter 4. The leadership qualities expected in change management, communicating vision and handling or relations with oppositions sh wholly be examined.Nevertheless, most people consider that leadership means to deplete an exalted position that commands confidence over an another(prenominal)(prenominal)s. Typical is the request by the mother of Zebedees children to Jesus Christ in Matthew Chapter 20 verses 20 and 21. Salome sought that Jesus will grant that her two sons take positions one on the left and the other on the right hand of Jesus in His kingdom. Jesu s confirmed that this is the manner of leadership order in the world, where the princes of the gentiles exercise dominion over them and they exercise great authority upon them. But it shall not be so among you.1Wright inferred that with this concept of leadership, only the few people occupying positions of authority and responsibility could be referred to as leaders and not every Christian.2Jesus advocated that leaders should serve quite a than being served3. This concept focuses on what we do as in service to God and to others as opposed to merely occupying positions. Paul, when writing to the Galatians instructs us that, by love serve one another4. Gods intention demonstrated by the blessing of Genesis Chapter 1 verse 28 shows that all humans withstand the right to lead and we need not occupy any position to do that. Wright again explained that if by leader we mean a person who enters into a relationship with another person to twist their behaviour, values or situations, hen ce I would suggest that all Christians should be leaders.5Damazio in his book reveals the danger the church faces today as scriptural principles laid in Gods word ar being replaced with cable principles frankincense making the church to run as business corporations rather than as New Testament organisations. Members hardly comprehend the truth of the word of God. Biblical requisite into leadership position demanding holiness, Holy trace in-filling, integrity and godly wisdom have gradually been replaced with faculty member scholarship hence robbing the church of its spiritual lifespan and vitality6. The church is gradually going the path Paul describes as having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof.7leaders STYLEs OF JESUS CHRIST and APOSTLE capital of Minnesota COMPARED AND CONTRASTEDJesus communicated His mission saying, For the son of Man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister and to give his life as ransom for many. This statement depicts servic e and sacrifice. Similarly, Paul in his Epistles revealed that his leadership is derived from being a retainer of Jesus Christ. Some translations of the Bible even allude to him as a bondservant of Jesus.Pauls leadership is by practice reflected in his statement, be followers of me as I am of Christ8, similar to Jesus, I do whatever I see the Father do9. This emanated from the law of reproduction of kinds every organism produces after(prenominal) its kind10 which actually has its root in Genesis at creation. It is popularly said, that success without a renewal is failure. As Jesus therefore commanded his disciples to teach all nations, so Paul instructed Timothy that the things which you have comprehend from me in the presence of many witnesses, these entrust to closelipped men, who will be able to teach others also, thus the continuity of the leadership chain guaranteed. The mentorship style of both Jesus and Paul is also here emphasised. harmonise to Ascough, Pauls style of leadership referenced in 1st Thessalonians 512-13 is, to respect those who work hard among you, who atomic number 18 over you in the headmaster and who admonish you. Hold them in highest regard because of their work11. Since these argon unidentified people, the term who be over you, implies they are leaders whose obligation is due to the work they do rather than their position. This tally with Jesus view that leadership is not about the office but the duties. While physical exercise authority in administrative offices, they are not to slack in their daily tasks of their work for which they are to be respected12.Accordingly, Agostos Jesus leadership challenged the political and spiritual leadership of His time. He identified with the populace that were overtaxed and oppressed by the Jewish domination helped by Roman authorities. He confronted the injustice, challenging the oppressors right into the tabernacle where He overthrew tables of money changers13. His weapon remained th e Word of God, referring His critics to the Old Testament book of Jeremiah 7 11 which says that the nominate of God has become den of robbers.14The difference between Jesus and Pauls leadership style is overt the government agency Jesus ministered to a local audience in the regions of Galilee and Jerusalem and ministered in Jewish temple and synagogues, Paul embarked on missionary journeys establishing churches in urban centres doneout the Roman Empire.Paul wrote to his followers while Jesus did not keep any writing except witnesses account compose after his death. This makes Paul display more comprehensible to us today than Jesus15. The gospel writers may not have written without elements of their personal agenda.THE FIVE FOLD LEADERSHIP MINISTRYIn Ephesians chapter 4, the five-fold leaders template was identified and Paul explained the project of the gifts. According to verse 12, the purpose of the gifts is not to boast but as tools to work with, that isThe perfecting of th e saints providing leadership for other believersThe work of the ministryThe edifying of the body of ChristAPOSTLESThe word apostle is from the Greek word apostollos meaning to send. That is called to re turn in Christ as a missionary, preaching the gospel and establishing churches.16Jesus was called an Apostle sent by God (Hebrews 31).17Stamps believe that apart from the signs of an Apostle mentioned in 2 Corinthians 1212, the apostles commissioned to write scriptures belonged to a different class to church leaders that succeed them.PROPHETSThe Old Testament prophets always appeal to the conscience of Gods people to remain faithful and telling of future events. Today they warn, rebuke exhort, comfort and pronounce judgement18. Their prophecies however are to be authenticated by the word of God.EVANGELISTSFrom the Greek root word evangel meaning good news, evangelists have the tasks of spreading the gospel of Christ. Jesus commanded His disciples to go into the world and preach the gospel to all creatures. Mark 1615. Every believer is expected to do this. But there are several(prenominal) specially ingenious of the Holy Spirit to evangelise and win many souls by preaching, miracles and deliverance19. Philip is a classical NT pillow slip (Acts 218).PASTORSPastors are shepherds to tend and oversee the flock of God in a local assembly. They are to feed the members with the undiluted word of God to ensure spiritual growth and provide leadership for the host in a local church. Apostle Paul was very clear in expressing the qualifications of bishop, Pastor or overseers which are not political but spiritual qualities (1 Timothy 3 1-7).TEACHERSTeachers lead Gods people providing sound school of thought and acting as the custodians of the truthfulness of the Word of God. They check and balance the ministry of prophets to prevent heresies20. They are also prudent for raising other teachers.The five-fold ministry are interrelated and interdependent. Individuals wit hin the body of Christ can possibly evident more than one of these gifts. Apostles are said to function in all five.LEADERSHIP WITH DEFINED AND project VISION TO FOLLOWERSHIP.According to Carson Pue, Leaders met in the past two decades and concur in the realisation of the salutary advantages of communicating their vision clearly and with such a feeling that people were able to follow. With numerous books on visionary leadership, Leaders wanting to achieve their target for various ministries or organisation will lock in need to cope with the modern requirement for the creation and communicating their visions. He made mention from tail end Cotters extensive research that Superior Leadership stems from power to translate a vision into reality and suffer it.Carson sums it all by the absolute need to take adequate time, involve enough people so as to successfully disseminate the vision. It will in turn be captured at all levels of workers in the organisation (boosting motivation) he nce assist in progression of goals for the Ministry.21A biblical example is the sequence with which the Lord did the commissioning of the disciples after resurrection as recorded in Acts 18 where the disciples were instructed to wait for Holy Ghost baptism to acquire the power required for evangelism.22MANAGEMENT OF CHANGES IN LEADERSHIP.According to Michael W Foss book A servants manual, Dr secure symbolises the process or challenge of Change to a burning platform with a multiple attitudinal answer form leadership. With the burning platform taken as the very circumstances that necessitates the required change, its management then translates to ability to call the attention of those whom the change will affect to it. While Persistence, patience and purpose are three key factors through a successful change, there are conservative leaders that will assert that the platform is not really on fire. This is an expression of denial immediately followed with the attitude that, we had fire s in the past this one is no different we will soon put it outThis foregoing attitude was linked to gradual decline in church attendance research at various congregations notwithstanding sustained evangelism. The big question to consider is if the platform is burning hot enough to absorb the obvious loss. Management of Change welcomes such loss as long as focus is brought from the past to the present for the sake of good future. Leaders are enjoined to make use of only vocabulary that will influence those who will receive the changes. Leaders are to stay connected to followers as followers like leaders who are with them rather than the one always in front of them.23MANAGEMENT OF OPPOSITIONS IN LEADERSHIPOppositions will come up from within the leadership scope and outside the scope itself, hence correspond to Bill Hulls book, the disciple making church, he used the example of Paul and Barnabas who saw opposition as normal and a clear projection of their success. With full recogni tion of Acts 1422 where it is expected that evangelism through tribulation are the pathway to Kingdom of God. Hull says that oppositions could be gotten from the resulting friction from the implementation of Gods agenda or from being passive and allowing the Church to be moribund with a resulting clamour against poor leadership skills. He further said that in evaluating approaches to opposition, it is good to bear in mind that the enemies of the ministry should only be in the categories of the opponents of the gospel. It is essential to let the opposition count rather than being ignored.Apostle Paul in a challenge time was encouraged by God who made it clear to him to continue the evangelism as there are many people in the city for God ( Acts 189-10), when he was abused by Corinthians Jews as he left them to continue preaching to the gentiles.24Conclusively, I am in support of Leadership that is arrive at to Change, manage changes as earlier mentioned by Michael Foss rather than t he passive leadership that only reacts to the aftermath of challenges rather than being pro-active or be mindful of overall disposition in the scope of leadership in the areas of needful changes and apparent opposition. This in line with warning from Hosea 46 which God warned that his people are perishing due to lack of Knowledge. This can also be likened to indifference and overly conservative attitude of some Modern day leaders.25